Hi,
I broke the amr_cam interface several months ago when I locked the
driver. I've been neglecting it ever since due to lack of time, and due
to the amr_cam interface not being terribly useful. If you do in fact
have a use for it, let me know and I'll add it to my TODO list.
Scott
Eugene M. Kim wrote:
Thanks, that fixed it! : )
scottl: Could you commit (and MFC) the fix? It's as simple as adding a
MODULE_DEPEND line:
MODULE_DEPEND(amr, cam, 1, 1, 1);
after the DRIVER_MODULE line in src/sys/dev/amr/amr_pci.c
I'm not sure about amr_linux though; it seems that there's no CAM
reference in amr_linux.c, but that amr_linux is just a compatibility
layer on top of amr. In that light, perhaps:
MODULE_DEPEND(amr_linux, amr, 1, 1, 1);
is in order. Also, the existing MODULE_DEPEND line probably should be
changed to:
MODULE_DEPEND(amr_linux, linux, 1, 1, 1);
Cheers,
Eugene
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Eugene M. Kim wrote this message on Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 19:55 -0700:
I'm trying to upgrade from 5-stable to 6-stable; after rebooting to the
new kernel, the amr(4) module (amr.ko) refuses to load with this message:
link_elf: symbol cam_simq_alloc undefined
However, a quick nm(1) on /boot/kernel/cam.ko does show:
...
0000f0ac T cam_sim_set_path
0000efc4 T cam_simq_alloc
0000efd4 T cam_simq_free
...
and cam.ko is already loaded before amr.ko.
What am I missing here? *scratches head 'o 'a*
amr is missing a:
MODULE_DEPEND(amr, cam, 1, 1, 1);
which means the module doesn't get cam's symbols... might as well add
that line to amr_linux.c next to MODULE_DEPEND already there...
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"