On Tuesday 02 May 2006 05:59, Peter Jeremy wrote:
= But probably not as fast since it's using a generic 'C' core instead
= of a hand-tweaked assembler core. I read Mikhail's comment as meaning
= that it is possible to build non-trivial 32-bit executables on amd64,
= there's just work still needed to make this work as a general case.
Thanks, Peter. You are correct, that was my meaning.
Interestingly, the assembler-optimized 32-bit routines made lame slower than
the native 64-bit code in my experiments (one may wish to compare assembler
vs. C lame on i386 too). But it all *worked*, which was the point...
-mi
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
