On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 01:54:58AM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 12:41:57AM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > > > >>Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> > >>>You missed the part where snapshots have caused deadlocks under > >>>varying conditions since day 1. They have never worked 100% reliably, > >>>and despite our best efforts that will remain true with 6.1. > >>> > >>>Kris > >>> > >>> > >>Then why utilize a known non-functional technology? > >> > > > >Because again, the benefits have been judged by the decision-makers > >and found to outweigh the drawbacks. Perhaps that's just a difficult > >concept for some people to understand if they're used to thinking of > >everything in binary terms. > > > > > Yes, i am sorry, but i fail to understand why i would want to use > something that i know does not work correctly. I think there are quite a > few of those "drawbacks" that are pissed off.
If you don't want to use software that isn't 100% perfect, your only hope is to turn off your computer forever. That's my last word on the subject, thanks. Kris
pgpaGQGbeihEK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
