On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 11:16:29PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > This should be documented somewhere clearly then, as my understanding was > that -STABLE meant that anything MFCd back to it *was* tested and deemed > stable ...
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/version-guide/decision-points.html > but "blantant and obvious bugs due to insufficient testing", IMHO, doesn't > classify as an 'oops' .... You've already made this point -- 3 times. What would you like us to do now, punish the committer? Simply reiterating your criticism and unhappiness isn't going to do anything to fix this problem (for which, of course, a fix has already been made), or the next one(s) either. It was an error, it's been fixed, may I suggest we move on to the next bug? mcl _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
