On 9/28/06, Dominic Marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:57:22 -0300 "Alexandre Biancalana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi list, > > Today I changed the main gateway from our network from PIII 733, 512 MB > Ram running FreeBSD 4-STABLE to a Xeon 3.0, 1Gb Ram running FreeBSD > 6-STABLE. But the performance of the network is worst than before. How are you measuring the performance?
I'm looking at some links usage... I know that you could argue that this is not consistent but these links have a very constant usage and today, after the change they have a utilization that is 20% lower than usual. My big doubt is why the new machine (that is A LOT better than the old) spend more than 50% off cpu time on interrupts when the old just arrived on 60% at "rush-time"
The new machine is a Dell PowerEdge 1800 have one quad DLink DFE-580TX, > one quad Adaptec ANA-62044 and one on board Intel em. I enabled the polling > on all interfaces, set the HZ to 1000 and set kern.polling.user_frac=30, but > this does not happened. What else is the machine doing, firewall, nat, traffic shaping, proxy?
PF+NAT+Squid+Qmail+Clamav+zebedee for 4 networks and about 600 users total. --
Dominic _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
_______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
