On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 02:39:06PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > Which is odd since the hypothesis Scott was working on should have > > > shown up clearly in the mutex trace, but did not. > > > > But it is consistent with there being a beat-frequency problem with > > respect to the scheduler. I think the number you really need is not > > how long giant was held but how long was spent waiting for it. > > It also seemed to show that nothing was really waiting for it (the > cnt_* entries).
I can set up a serial console an poke around in DDB during my test case if anyone thinks some useful information can be found. Unfortunately I'm remote from the machine right now so I won't be able to do that until Monday :/ Craig _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
