On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 07:19:30 -0700 (PDT) Danial Thom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe its just time for the entire FreeBSD team > to come out of its world of delusion and come to > terms with what every real-life user of FreeBSD > knows: In how ever many years of development, > there is still no good reason to use anything > other than FreeBSD 4.x except that 4.x doesn't This statement is way too broad, I as a FreeBSD user can vouch for FreeBSD 6.x - it works in most situations. > The right thing to do is to port the SATA support > and new NIC support back to 4.x and support both. Go ahead - there is nothing stopping you. > Come to terms with it, > PLEASE, because it is the case and saying > otherwise won't change it. >From wher I'm sitting (and I'm just a FreeBSD user), it is you who have to come to terms with the annouced EOL for 4.x > My prediction is that a year from now we'll all > be using DragonflyBSD and you guys will be > looking for a new bunch of beta-test guinea pigs. We'll see. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen, Norway _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
