On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 08:24:14AM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Andrew Thompson wrote: > > Hi, > > >I have a patch here to MFC the rstp code to RELENG_6. It should be all > >fine and dandy as for API but will cause the default spanning tree > >version to change from stp to rstp. > > > >Is it ok to change the protocol version for the STABLE users (rstp is > >backwards compatable with stp) or should it still default to stp and > >require the OP to enable rstp. > > > >Any opinions? > > I think you should leave stp as default and have the user configure rstp > if (s)he thinks (s)he needs it. Yes, I think thats the safest. It will just need a bit more info in the man page so people know it exists.
Andrew _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"