Wang Yi wrote: > I'm using ntfs-3g now. the version is same to yours. But only the difference > is the disk I > used is a physical disk.
I also had no luck using it on my existing NTFS partition, though I'd like to experiment on a clean partition first. Could you please run a test with mdconfig and mkfs.ntfs (you have to use the -F flag)? Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > On 6.2-RELEASE using fusefs-kmod-0.3.0_4, fusefs-libs-2.6.2, and > fusefs-ntfs-0.20070207RC1, I > can mount my existing (Windows XP) NTFS partition with 'ntfs-3g /dev/ad0s1 > /mnt/ad0s1'. > > The following error messages about missing /proc/filesystems and modprobe can > be ignored, > since defaults are assumed in case of missing information. (I read about it > on a fusefs > mailing list concerning Darwin.) The critical part seems to be the seekscript. Could one of you guys provide me with a ktrace/kdump output, so I can investigate this further? You should run ktrace with the -i flag and probably send the output off-list. Thanks! Ulrich Spoerlein -- A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? > >A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > >>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
