On Saturday 17 March 2007 03:58, Mark Andrews wrote:

> > > nothing goes to this machine because by default everything is blocked
> > > until
> > >
> > > you permit it
> >
> > You're absolutely correct, however your original post seems to have
> > taken many of us by surprise, causing some of us (at least me!) to
> > assume that you've changed the default method to allow.  I'm obviously
> > misunderstanding, so I apologise for that, but I hope you can see the
> > reasoning behind my comments with what I knew at the time.  :)
>
>       ipfw needs to be before networking or router discovery
>       fails for IPv6.
>
>       http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/108589
>


as default any network connection will fail so long as you do not permit it

If rtsol fails or is called to early it is an rtsol problem and not an ipfw 
problem I guess

as another example, what if you set a ifconfig_nic0="inet hostname" instead of 
IP address and this hostname is not in /etc/hosts and ipfw is still not up 
and named is far away to start, then, according to your idea we need to start 
named and ipfw before netif?




-- 

João







A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik  https://datacenter.matik.com.br
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to