On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:14:20PM +0400, Oleg Derevenetz wrote: > > Until you (or a developer) have analyzed the resulting information, > > you cannot definitively determine whether or not your problem is the > > same as a given random other problem, and you may just confuse the > > issue by making claims of similarity when you are really reporting a > > completely separate problem. > > Not all people can do deadlock debugging, though. In my case turning on > INVARIANTS and WITNESS leads to unacceptable performance penalty due to > heavily > loaded server. So I can only describe my case, actions and result without > providing any debug information.
But you can still do *some* things, e.g. backtraces and/or a coredump: every little bit helps. Ultimately, though, you have to understand and accept that the less information you provide, the less chance there is that a developer will be able to track down your problem. In fact a developer may have to effectively ignore your problem report altogether, because of what I explained about "symptoms" usually not being enough to tell one bug from another. In general, when you encounter a bug in FreeBSD, you have a little bit of work to do on your side before we can start doing the rest. I understand that you may not be in a position to do that work, but that means you also need to understand that we can't do it either. Kris
pgpe7wGSIKiIP.pgp
Description: PGP signature