Wesley Shields wrote:
> The difference is that csup is written in C and included in the base.
> The only lacking feature in csup is that it doesn't work in checkout
> mode, which shouldn't be a problem for your average use.
You have it backwards. csup _only_ works in checkout mode, what it
can't do is mirror a repository. This is fine for the average FreeBSD
user however, since checking out the current version of the src or
ports tree is what the vast majority do anyway.
> I may be wrong about checkout mode, but that was a caveat when it went
> into the tree IIRC. If that is no longer the case I apologize for the
> misinformation.
If you are going to offer advice on the lists, please take the time to
verify that what you're saying is correct. Otherwise it's just a waste
of time for all concerned.
I'm picking on your post here a little because it's a good example of
a disturbing trend, please don't take it personally.
Regards,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
