Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Jul 23, 2007, at 7:10 AM, Oliver Fromme wrote: >> [LoN]Kamikaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> server 0.de.pool.ntp.org minpoll 4 maxpoll 8 >>> server 1.de.pool.ntp.org minpoll 4 maxpoll 8 >>> server 2.de.pool.ntp.org minpoll 4 maxpoll 8 >>> server ntp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de minpoll 4 maxpoll 8 >>> server ntp2.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de minpoll 4 maxpoll 8 >>> server ntp3.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de minpoll 4 maxpoll 8 >>> server ntp4.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de minpoll 4 maxpoll 8 >>> >>> restrict default ignore >>> restrict 127.0.0.1 >> >> You need to add proper restrict lines for the servers, >> of course. Basically you have configured ntpd to >> ignore all servers. >> >> Also, putting "minpoll 4 maxpoll 8" on all servers is >> somewhat suboptimal and puts an unnecessary burden on the >> servers and networks without reason. I recommend to use >> low polling intervals and the iburst option for one or >> two local servers only (e.g. for NTP servers located in >> your direct upstream or at your ISP), and higher polling >> intervals for other public servers. > > I wish to second what Oliver has said, only more strongly: using > "minpoll 4" is considered abusive and a misuse of the NTP pool. From > http://www.pool.ntp.org/use.html
That was only for testing. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
