On 10/2/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Vlad GALU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > "Vlad GALU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > The symptoms were exhibited even with rev. 1.16. I've CC'ed him so > > > > he can catch up with the thread. > > > Which symptoms? I can no longer reproduce the hang-on-close bug. > > Strangely enough, me neither. In his case, allocated pts' wouldn't get > > deallocated once the sessions ended. > > Wouldn't get deallocated right away, or wouldn't get deallocated at all? > Apparently, it is not unusual for pts reclamation to be delayed a bit by > a non-zero refcnt. >
As per my other mail, they wouldn't get deallocated at all. They still show up in /dev/pts/ even after closing, and the next integer index is picked up upon the next terminal creation. > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- If it's there, and you can see it, it's real. If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual. If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent. If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
