On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 04:45:41PM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: [...] > > > > Me either. I have a WIP version that fixes other issues on re(4) but > > I'm not sure whether it mitigates your issue. The overhauled re(4) > > supports larger descriptors(256 instead of 64) and TSO. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/if_re.c > > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/if_rlreg.h > > Before I try them what is the difference between these and two other > posted patches? and second since I use a cvs repo against -current can
Sorry, I don't know what patches you are referring to. Maybe I've posted too many patches. :( > you repost them as patches? (if no on the second I will make an > attempt to do it but I am still new at making patches) > Sure. http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/re.HEAD.patch -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
