-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Snow wrote:
| Xin LI wrote:
|> Speaking as my own: Base system needs more conservative QA process, e.g.
| ...
|> rushing into a "presumably patched" state would not be a very good
|> solution.
|
| I second this opinion. When there is hype all over the net about a new
| vulnerability, it is too easy to allow ill-considered changes to be
| rushed in without enough critical thought and testing.
And even more so when the perceived "breakage" is in the design rather
than any specific implementation,
Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAkh16yEACgkQQv9rrgRC1JKtCgCgoMbmQ+clRgDvZBbHzLJxB0No
EgYAn15Hk/jUcDnnahN0msD1J6+xUa48
=oIUJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
