On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > it more difficult than I expected. >> > for one, the kernel date was missleading, the actual source update is the >> > key, so >> > the window of changes is now 28/July to 19/August. I have the diffs, but >> > nothing >> > yet seems relevant. >> > >> > on the other hand, I tried NFS/TCP, and there things seem ok, ie the >> > 'good' and the 'bad' >> > give the same throughput, which seem to point to UDP changes ... >> >> Can you post the network-numbers? > [again :-]
Thank you. :-) Was not shure whether tcp gave you same performance compared to udp or tcp-performance was stable throughout the same period where udp would degrade. >> > Writing 16 MB file >> > BS Count /---- 7.0 ------/ /---- 7.1 -----/ > > should now read: > /---- Aug 18 ------/ /--- Aug 19 ----/ >> > 1*512 32768 0.16s 98.11MB/s 0.43s 37.18MB/s >> > 2*512 16384 0.17s 92.04MB/s 0.46s 34.79MB/s >> > 4*512 8192 0.16s 101.88MB/s 0.43s 37.26MB/s >> > 8*512 4096 0.16s 99.86MB/s 0.44s 36.41MB/s >> > 16*512 2048 0.16s 100.11MB/s 0.50s 32.03MB/s >> > 32*512 1024 0.26s 61.71MB/s 0.46s 34.79MB/s >> > 64*512 512 0.22s 71.45MB/s 0.45s 35.41MB/s >> > 128*512 256 0.21s 77.84MB/s 0.51s 31.34MB/s >> > 256*512 128 0.19s 82.47MB/s 0.43s 37.22MB/s >> > 512*512 64 0.18s 87.77MB/s 0.49s 32.69MB/s >> > 1024*512 32 0.18s 89.24MB/s 0.47s 34.02MB/s >> > 2048*512 16 0.17s 91.81MB/s 0.30s 53.41MB/s >> > 4096*512 8 0.16s 100.56MB/s 0.42s 38.07MB/s >> > 8192*512 4 0.82s 19.56MB/s 0.80s 19.95MB/s >> > 16384*512 2 0.82s 19.63MB/s 0.95s 16.80MB/s >> > 32768*512 1 0.81s 19.69MB/s 0.96s 16.64MB/s >> > >> > Average: 75.86 33.00 -- regards Claus When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom, the gentler gamester is the soonest winner. Shakespeare _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
