On 02 Jan 2014, at 22:36, Dimitry Andric <d...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 02 Jan 2014, at 01:11, Dimitry Andric <d...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> On 01 Jan 2014, at 23:37, Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com> wrote: >>> I'd add to the list the upgrade path (from 9.x, 10.x and current) as well, >>> just to make sure they all still work... If there are problems with the 9.x >>> upgrade path, we'll need to call them out since 10.0 hasn't been released >>> yet and there's still a lot of 9.x boxes in the wild... ... > With this diff, I have successfully built head on 9.2-STABLE with gcc as > the base compiler. I will also test it on 10.0-RC4, but I foresee no > problems there.
Rebased against head r260207, since sys/amd64/vmm/intel/vmx.c did not need patching anymore: http://www.andric.com/freebsd/clang/head-r260207-clang34-1.diff.xz SHA256 (head-r260207-clang34-1.diff.xz) = 02ddf89b5173bb1dac1e18e529b146ba5882f5ae6cb9c3527ef4eb514e17dd3c -Dimitry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
