Is the below a BSDL vs. GPL DTS issue?
In my attempt to build sysutils/u-boot-pine64 I got:
OBJCOPY u-boot.srec
OBJCOPY u-boot-nodtb.bin
start=$(aarch64-none-elf-nm u-boot | grep __rel_dyn_start | cut -f 1 -d ' ');
end=$(aarch64-none-elf-nm u-boot | grep __rel_dyn_end | cut -f 1 -d ' ');
tools/relocate-rela u-boot-nodtb.bin 0x4a000000 $start $end
SYM u-boot.sym
DTC arch/arm/dts/pine64_plus.dtb
Error at arch/arm/dts/.pine64_plus.dtb.dts.tmp:533:27: Expected unit address
gic: interrupt-controller@{
^
Error at arch/arm/dts/.pine64_plus.dtb.dts.tmp:533:27: Failed to find root node
/.
gic: interrupt-controller@{
^
Failed to parse tree.
gmake[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.lib:299: arch/arm/dts/pine64_plus.dtb] Error 1
gmake[2]: *** [dts/Makefile:36: arch-dtbs] Error 2
gmake[1]: *** [Makefile:821: dts/dt.dtb] Error 2
gmake[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
gmake[1]: Leaving directory
'/usr/obj/portswork/usr/ports/sysutils/u-boot-pine64/work/u-boot-2016.05'
Looking at the gic part of the source. . .
# more
/usr/obj/portswork/usr/ports/sysutils/u-boot-pine64/work/u-boot-2016.05/arch/arm/dts/a64.dtsi
. . .
gic: interrupt-controller@{
compatible = "arm,gic-400";
interrupt-controller;
#interrupt-cells = <3>;
#address-cells = <0>;
reg = <0x01C81000 0x1000>,
<0x01C82000 0x2000>,
<0x01C84000 0x2000>,
<0x01C86000 0x2000>;
interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9
(GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
};
I'll be trying 3 other u-boot-*'s so I may have more to
report later.
===
Mark Millard
mar...@dsl-only.net
_______________________________________________
freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
