On 29 Jul 2017, at 17:55, Dimitry Andric <d...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > The demangler in libcxxrt is indeed rather old, and we should replace it > with something newer. I'm not sure if the demangler of libc++abi is the > right one yet, since upstream seems to still be discussing which of > their three (or thereabouts) demanglers should be *the* LLVM demangler. > > Ed, IIRC you had some looks at this before, do you have any preference?
I spoke to the ELF Toolchain maintainer a little while ago and pointed out that the demangler that we got from there lacked some features. Maybe we can persuade him to add support for r-value references? Ideally, I’d like to make the one in libcxxrt a weak symbol and ship the LLVM one in a separate library - it’s very big, so linking it into things like devd would be silly, but anything that’s dynamically linking libc++ would probably not notice the increase in code size. David _______________________________________________ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
