Here are the graphs.. Drew tells me they got stripped off :-)
http://people.freebsd.org/~rrs/c35.png http://people.freebsd.org/~rrs/c36.png R On Dec 9, 2015, at 8:13 AM, Randall Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > All: > > Ok so I have had a first cut of an A/B test with a machine using fixed calls > to tcp_do_segment/output etc and > one using the new pluggable pointer based stack. As expected I can’t really > tell any real difference between > the two machines. > > They are both Intel Ivy Bridge E5-2650L Intel CPU’s. Running at 1.7Ghz, 64G > of memory and 10 physical cores. > > Here are png’s of the per second cpu use and the overall serving bandwidth > (if anyone wants the raw numbers > let me know). > > The two machines are basically the same, serving the same content. > > I have a few other pairs I will be trying this on.. though I don’t expect any > real difference. > > Robert, how are you coming on investigating the overhead of function pointers > on non-intel devices ? > > I would like to commit the tcp-stack changes soon if possible :-) > > R > > > <c35.png> > <c36.png> > -------- > Randall Stewart > [email protected] > 803-317-4952 > > > > > -------- Randall Stewart [email protected] 803-317-4952 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-transport To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
