On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 18:35 +0200, Christian Gusenbauer wrote:
> Hi Florent!
> 
> On Sunday, 15. October 2006 23:25, Florent Thoumie wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-10-15 at 18:37 +0200, Christian Gusenbauer wrote:
> > > Hi Florent!
> > >
> > > Sorry for the late response, I was on vacation.
> > >
> > > My first intention was to add a quirk for that device to the uftdi
> > > driver, but that was not the correct way to get the connection to my
> > > mobile phone running. The second attempt was to add the quirk to the
> > > uppc-kmod port, but that failed, too. Currently, I need the definition in
> > > my own driver's product list. So there's no need to add a quirk anymore.
> > > That's why I'd like to see the definitions appear in the usbdevs file.
> >
> > What driver are we talking about? Is it already in the source tree?
> > If not, then I'm not sure adding a product/vendor id without using it is
> > a common practice. You can use the ids without using any macros.
> 
> No the driver ist not in the tree, yet. It's far from being complete. I'm 
> working on a driver which should help to communicate with Symbian OS9 devices 
> (e.g. the Sony/Ericsson M600i).
> 
> So should I ask again for adding these constants when the driver is working 
> and ready to be "released"?

Yes, that would be best I'd say.

-- 
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to