On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:12:13PM -0200, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > > On Thu, November 18, 2010 18:24, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 04:20:51PM -0200, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, November 18, 2010 13:10, Derrick Brashear wrote: > >> > The following reply was made to PR usb/140883; it has been noted by > >> GNATS. > >> > > >> > From: Derrick Brashear <sha...@gmail.com> > >> > To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, sub.m...@gmail.com > >> > Cc: > >> > Subject: Re: usb/140883: [axe] [usb8] USB gigabit ethernet hangs after > >> > short > >> > period of traffic > >> > Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:36:50 -0500 > >> > > >> > Pyun has provided an updated driver which avoids several issues > >> > including using a too-large transmit buffer (the chipset claims only > >> > 8k) but none of the fixes worked until he disabled frame combining > >> for > >> > transmit. With only a single packet being sent per frame (as was the > >> > case in FreeBSD 7, apparently) seems to make the issue go away. None > >> > of the cases I could use to reproduce the issue now happen. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Derrick > >> > >> is this already in 8-stable ? I have a couple of axe(4) based nic's > >> they're not ok on 8-stable. I've talked to Pyun before, and that time > >> seemed do solve the issue (with gigabit belkin axe based) but now I > >> can't > >> get them to work anymore. even fast ethernet linksys axe are just dying > >> when in a bridge (switched to OpenBSD to have it working). > >> > >> how ca I try this to help ? > >> > > > > I uploaded updated if_axe.c/if_axereg.h to the following URL. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/axe/if_axe.c > > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/axe/if_axereg.h > > > > That files seem to fix axe(4) hang which were seen on AX88772A > > controller. One of most notable changes are removing combining > > multiple TX frames in TX path such that this change may result in > > sub-optimal performance for most axe(4) controllers. However it > > seems that change makes Derrick's controller work without problems. > > Generally I prefer driver stability over performance so if this > > change also fixes other axe(4) stability issues reported so far, I > > want to check in the change. > > > > Thanks. > > well, > > things did got better here. but the link state UP and DOWN are still there :( > > ugen2.3: <vendor 0x050d> at usbus2 > axe1: <vendor 0x050d product 0x5055, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 3> on usbus2 > axe1: PHYADDR 0xe0:0x01 > miibus2: <MII bus> on axe1 > ukphy2: <Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface> PHY 1 on miibus2 > ukphy2: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > 1000baseT-FD > X, auto
It seems you have PHY driver issue. Normally all gigabit PHYs should have their own PHY driver since most PHYs hardwares tend to have a special register that reports link state changes. Show me the output of "devinfo -rv | grep phy". > ue1: <USB Ethernet> on axe1 > ue1: Ethernet address: "my mac shown here :)" > ue1: link state changed to DOWN > ue1: link state changed to UP > ue1: link state changed to DOWN > ue1: link state changed to UP > ue1: link state changed to DOWN > ue1: link state changed to UP > ue1: link state changed to DOWN > ue1: link state changed to UP > ue1: link state changed to DOWN > ue1: link state changed to UP > ue1: link state changed to DOWN > ue1: link state changed to UP > ue1: link state changed to DOWN > ue1: link state changed to UP > ue1: link state changed to DOWN > ue1: link state changed to UP > ue1: link state changed to DOWN > ue1: link state changed to UP > ue1: link state changed to DOWN > ue1: link state changed to UP > ue1: link state changed to DOWN > ue1: link state changed to UP > ue1: link state changed to DOWN > ue1: link state changed to UP > ue1: link state changed to DOWN > ue1: link state changed to UP > ue1: link state changed to DOWN > ue1: link state changed to UP > ugen1.2: <Microsoft> at usbus1 (disconnected) > ukbd0: at uhub1, port 1, addr 2 (disconnected) > ums0: at uhub1, port 1, addr 2 (disconnected) > uhid0: at uhub1, port 1, addr 2 (disconnected) > ue1: link state changed to DOWN > ue1: link state changed to UP > > the good thing is, it usually never got recognized, and was said not to > have a PHY (or something alike). > Are you using 8.1-RELEASE? If yes, please give it try stable/8 and use axe(4) I posted. > so I get this: > > ping 192.168.1.2 > PING 192.168.1.2 (192.168.1.2): 56 data bytes > ping: sendto: No route to host > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.912 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.2: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.842 ms > ping: sendto: No route to host > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.2: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=1.015 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.2: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.774 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.2: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.789 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.2: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.851 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.2: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=0.915 ms > ^C > --- 192.168.1.2 ping statistics --- > 11 packets transmitted, 7 packets received, 36.4% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.774/0.871/1.015/0.077 ms > > on local network. > > thanks, > > matheus > > > -- > We will call you cygnus, > The God of balance you shall be > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style _______________________________________________ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"