On 01/12/14 07:10, Alex Goncharov wrote:
The following reply was made to PR usb/185628; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Alex Goncharov <alex_goncharov_...@yahoo.com>
To: "freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org" <freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org>,
   Hans Petter Selasky <h...@bitfrost.no>, freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: usb/185628: usbd_req_re_enumerate set address failed 
USB_ERR_STALLED for Seagate USB drives between r259425 and r260321
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 21:58:02 -0800 (PST)

  --2120775178-1643984294-1389506282=:33519
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

  ,-- On Fri, 1/10/14, Hans Petter Selasky <h...@bitfrost.no> wrote:
  ,-- On 01/10/14 12:49, Alex Goncharov  wrote:
  >> Maybe; but think about the fact correlations: the fact of the two
  >> system's upgrade, two identical Seagate units, and  other HDDs being
  >> non-stalled.
  >
  > If you are running EHCI, there has been no changes in the USB stack,

  Apparently, there have been; this is what causes the bogus error:

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
  r259454 | hselasky | 2013-12-16 03:51:58 -0500 (Mon, 16 Dec 2013) | 11 lines

  MFC r244503 and r246565:

  Make sure all USB drivers allocate buffer memory
  through the USB API and/or busdma.

  The following assumptions have been made:
  umass - buffers passed from CAM/SCSI layer are OK
  network - mbufs are OK.

  Some other nits while at it.
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------

  I am attaching the code difference for the two relevant files

  ----------------------------------------
  M       sys/dev/usb/storage/ustorage_fs.c
  M       sys/dev/usb/usb_msctest.c
  ----------------------------------------

  in this change set, skipping the irrelevant 'sys/dev/usb/wlan' ones.

  Can this be fixed reasonably soon, please? (I miss my HDDs :)


Hi,

Can you do "usbdump -i usbusX -s 65536 -vvv" where is X is the controller unit which the seagate drive attaches to, before and after reverting patch "259454". I need to see what the difference is in the USB level, because patch "259454" should not affect the protocol data only the timing.

--HPS

_______________________________________________
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to