https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224454
--- Comment #3 from Hans Petter Selasky <hsela...@freebsd.org> --- Hi, libusb is the same for -12 and -11. Just make a patch for your current system and I'll fix the rest. > I think libusb_has_capability is easier to implement. Do you think it is > correct for libusb_has_capability to always return 1 for the hotplug > capability? Can you check what is expected by the hotplug capability? What functions must be implemented when this capability returns 1? > I found there is another missing function today: > libusb_interrupt_event_handler. gvfs uses it in its MTP backend, > and this is the only libusb function it calls. gvfs has an > option to disable libusb support, so it doesn't cause build problems. Is this a variant of the existing "libusb_event_handler_active()"? Can you investigate a bit? --HPS -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
