And lets not forget the head start vmware has (bhyve is what? 1-2 years old?) and the size of it. Less then 1mb in code.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Łukasz Wąsikowski <luk...@wasikowski.net>wrote: > W dniu 2014-01-28 12:18, Andrea Brancatelli pisze: > > > We did a very rough comparison betweend BHyVe and VMWare ESXi. Maybe you > > want to give it a read and let me know if I did write a bunch of sh!t :-) > > > > > http://andrea.brancatelli.it/2014/01/28/freebsd-10-0-bhyve-vmware-esxi-5-5-comparison/ > > > > I must say I'm very pleased with BHyVe performances! Very good work!! > > > > Thanks for your time. > > You've wrote: > > > BHyVe took 332 seconds > VMWare took 313 seconds > > The difference is about 106.7%. > > I think that the correct conclusion should state: if we assume VMware's > time as a reference than BHyVe was 6.7% slower (not 106.7%). And it > should be 6,41% really :) > > -- > best regards, > Lukasz Wasikowski > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
