On 30 Nov 2014, at 5:04, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 11/29/14, 5:28 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Julian Elischer <jul...@freebsd.org
<mailto:jul...@freebsd.org>> wrote:
>
>
> also look at the following: (a little dated)
>
>
http://p4web.freebsd.org/@md=d&cd=//depot/projects/vimage/&cdf=//depot/projects/vimage/porting_to_vimage.txt&c=tO0@//depot/projects/vimage/porting_to_vimage.txt?ac=22
This is a useful document. I put it on the wiki:
https://wiki.freebsd.org/VIMAGE/porting-to-vimage
Thanks.. wow, did I actually know ALL that only 5 years ago?
Scary. probbaly worth having someone who is currently active and up
to date look at it to see if it's all still correct..
especially the module load/unload stuff.
--
Craig
On a slight tangent. I ran VIMAGE kernels vs. non VIMAGE kernels for
both a VANILLA kernel
and a PF kernel (PF on but no rules) as a quick smoke test today. The
raw forwarding performance
was unchanged between kernels with and without VIMAGE on a 10G based
system in the Sentex lab
(lion1). I will be doing a bit more work in this area and will then put
up some results in my
netperf github repo.
The tests are easy enough to run if you have 3 systems, and Conductor
installed. The source, sink
and dut config files are all there to be updated and tried.
Best,
George
_______________________________________________
freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
