https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254479
Mark Johnston <ma...@freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ma...@freebsd.org Status|Open |Closed Resolution|--- |Not A Bug --- Comment #5 from Mark Johnston <ma...@freebsd.org> --- Whether the lock is held doesn't really matter. At this point the driver owns the mbuf. The lock only protects driver state, so if, say, it updates a descriptor to point to the mbuf buffer, we'd want to ensure that the pointer is cleared before the mbuf is freed or handed off to other layers. But the actual m_freem() call does not require any synchronization. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"