On 01/17/12 13:06, Carsten Heesch wrote: > There's a folder ec2-bits in the root directory, which contains a bunch of > patches. From your blog post I gather that they will not (much longer) be > required if one was to build their own kernel?
What gave you that idea? The patches in that directory are the differences between the 9.0-RELEASE source tree and the one I used to build the AMI. > On the same subject: The kernel running in that AMI is apparently i386/XENHVM: > > FreeBSD ip-10-30-30-11 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Mon Jan 16 > 18:25:55 UTC 2012 > root@ip-10-17-42-118:/usr/obj/i386.i386/usr/src/sys/XENHVM i386 > > The csup'ed source tree does not contain such configuration. It does for > amd64. And there's a XEN configuration for i386. But no XENHVM configuration > for i386. Yep, that's why there's a patch in /root/ec2-bits which adds XENHVM. :-) -- Colin Percival Security Officer, FreeBSD | freebsd.org | The power to serve Founder / author, Tarsnap | tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid _______________________________________________ freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
