Bu yöntemlerin lighttpd'nin memcaching ya da normal caching yöntemlerine göre avantajları ya da farkları var mıdır? Dil olarak Ruby ya da Python kullanıyorum.
2008/6/24 OSMAN ORHAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Acaba bu teste symfony nin etkisi var mı? Yani bildiğim kadarıyla > symfony nin kendi cache mekanizması var? > > Şurada da bir test var ; > > http://blog.digitalstruct.com/2007/12/23/php-accelerators-apc-vs-zend-vs-xcache-with-zend-framework/ > > > 2008/6/24 Mesut GÜLNAZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Çok teşekkürler... > > > > > > > > From: Engin Dumlu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:51 PM > > To: freebsd@lists.enderunix.org > > Subject: Re: [FreeBSD] hangi php cache uygulaması > > > > > > > > symfony framework üzerinde çalışan bir sistemde test yaptım, xcache bariz > > fark atıyor, sonuçlar şöyle: > > > > ---------------------- eacc ----------------------------- > > > > srv1:/www/stage# ab -c 10 -t 6 http://localhost/ > > This is ApacheBench, Version 2.0.40-dev <$Revision: 1.146 $> apache-2.0 > > Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/ > > Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/ > > > > Benchmarking localhost (be patient) > > Finished 465 requests > > > > > > Server Software: Apache/2.2.3 > > Server Hostname: localhost > > Server Port: 80 > > > > Document Path: / > > Document Length: 5935 bytes > > > > Concurrency Level: 10 > > Time taken for tests: 6.11133 seconds > > Complete requests: 465 > > Failed requests: 0 > > Write errors: 0 > > Total transferred: 2973672 bytes > > HTML transferred: 2777580 bytes > > Requests per second: 77.36 [#/sec] (mean) > > Time per request: 129.272 [ms] (mean) > > Time per request: 12.927 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent > requests) > > Transfer rate: 482.94 [Kbytes/sec] received > > > > Connection Times (ms) > > min mean[+/-sd] median max > > Connect: 0 0 0.0 0 0 > > Processing: 43 126 83.1 107 880 > > Waiting: 43 126 83.0 106 880 > > Total: 43 126 83.1 107 880 > > > > Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) > > 50% 107 > > 66% 129 > > 75% 148 > > 80% 158 > > 90% 195 > > 95% 271 > > 98% 378 > > 99% 543 > > 100% 880 (longest request) > > > > > > > > > > ------------------ xcache ----------------------- > > > > srv1:/www/stage# ab -c 10 -t 6 http://localhost/ > > This is ApacheBench, Version 2.0.40-dev <$Revision: 1.146 $> apache-2.0 > > Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/ > > Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/ > > > > Benchmarking localhost (be patient) > > Finished 624 requests > > > > > > Server Software: Apache/2.2.3 > > Server Hostname: localhost > > Server Port: 80 > > > > Document Path: / > > Document Length: 5935 bytes > > > > Concurrency Level: 10 > > Time taken for tests: 6.1119 seconds > > Complete requests: 624 > > Failed requests: 0 > > Write errors: 0 > > Total transferred: 3971250 bytes > > HTML transferred: 3709375 bytes > > Requests per second: 103.98 [#/sec] (mean) > > Time per request: 96.172 [ms] (mean) > > Time per request: 9.617 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests) > > Transfer rate: 646.21 [Kbytes/sec] received > > > > Connection Times (ms) > > min mean[+/-sd] median max > > Connect: 0 0 0.0 0 0 > > Processing: 23 94 64.5 72 434 > > Waiting: 0 93 64.4 71 434 > > Total: 23 94 64.5 72 434 > > > > Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) > > 50% 72 > > 66% 104 > > 75% 125 > > 80% 139 > > 90% 183 > > 95% 217 > > 98% 277 > > 99% 330 > > 100% 434 (longest request) > > > > > > 2008/6/24 OSMAN ORHAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Facebook un APC kullandığını biliyorum, ama facebook un bu konuda kötü > > olduğunu da eklemek lazım(fakat bunu direk cache mekanizmasına > > bağlamak doğru olmaz herhalde); > > http://www.scribd.com/doc/88689/apcfacebook > > > > > > > > 2008/6/23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >> Selam; > >> > >> PHPAccelerator kullandim acikcasi cok verimli degildi. Su an XCache > >> kullaniyorum gayet memnunum ince ayarlar yaparak cok iyi performanslar > >> alabilirsiniz. > >> > >> Saygilar > >> > >>> opcode cache için 3 senedir eaccelerator kullanıyorum, ortalama rps 3-4 > >>> kat > >>> artıyor diyebilirim > >>> > >>> normalde 30 - 40 req/s iken eacc ile 80 - 90 req/s > >>> > >>> xcachede fena değil aslında, > >>> > >>> > >>> > http://xcache.lighttpd.net/wiki/Introduction#ButwhydoyouwriteXCacheafterthatWhynotcontributetoeaapc > >>> > >>> selamlar > >>> > >>> > >>> 2008/6/22 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>> > >>>> merhabalar, > >>>> > >>>> xcache, APC ya da eaccelerator. > >>>> > >>>> bu 3 uygulamayı da kurdum. çalıştırdım. denedim ama hangisini > >>>> kullanacağıma > >>>> karar veremedim. > >>>> > >>>> sizler hangisini tansiye edersiniz.? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Engin Dumlu > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> FreeBSD 6 kitabi: http://www.acikakademi.com/catalog/freebsd6 > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> Listeye soru sormadan once lutfen http://ipucu.enderunix.org sitesine > >> bakiniz. > >> > >> Cikmak icin, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Liste arsivi: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.org.user-groups.bsd.turkey > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Engin Dumlu > -- Onur
