Per I. Mathisen wrote: > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, William Allen Simpson wrote: >> Apparently without discussion, 2.1 has been officially abandoned, as 2.2 >> has been branched in the repository. > > If you did not read the discussion, how could you reach the conclusion it > has been abandoned? The plan is still to release 2.1 soon (as has been > the plan for a very long time). > There was no discussion on this list -- nor on any other list that I'm subscribed -- about branching 2.2.
The usual meaning of a "branch" is the working version for release, or a private copy for a particular developer to be merged back into trunk. Therefore, since 2.2 has been branched and is not a private copy, 2.1 is now abandoned. >> Unfortunately, nobody has yet added the 2.2 tag in RT. I cannot tag >> things for 2.2, until then I won't be working on 2.2 either. > > Added. Anything else I need to to do? > That's helpful. >> What's the beta schedule for 2.2? > > After 2.1 is released and the map editor is complete, I would say. > If the map editor is not complete, then 2.2 should not have been branched, as it was not ready. > I think any rules work like advanced governments will go into trunk only > now. > Agreed. _______________________________________________ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
