<URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40365 >
Actually I don't like the way the tier field is obtained at the client side. It is brittle in that it assumes that terrains are sent in the same order as the server reads them from the ruleset. In other words, the protocol is not stateless, and this could be annoying later. (Though the potential for causing trouble of a bad tier field value on the client side is rather minor.) For S2_1 then, this drawback would be acceptable in order to not have to change packet formats, but for S2_2+ the tier field should be sent in PACKET_RULESET_RESOURCE, to remove the tier calculation from the client and keep it "dumb". So I will re-work the S2_2/trunk version to make it more robust in this manner. Are there any objections to having the S2_1 version committed (depends on #40364) so that resource conversion behaves the same as it did in 2.0/civ2? Also, no problems with splitting the grassland "resources" resource into "animal resources" and "plant resources"? Or we could just leave S2_1 as is and have these resource conversion fixes/features for S2_2 only. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 一体どうするかな _______________________________________________ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
