Update of bug #13873 (project freeciv):
Status: None => In Progress
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #11:
I don't like how setting_ruleset() works. Maybe you could convince me the
way you choose. For the moment, this is my argumentation.
You iterate all settings, and attempt to take their value in the file. In a
such implementation, I think the best would be to use secfile_lookup_str(),
secfile_lookup_int() and secfile_lookup_bool() instead of a their _default
variant.
Another approach would be to iterate all the entries of the ruleset file and
try to match the settings. I guess this could be the best solution because
usually, there are not a lot of settings defined in the ruleset. Also, this
would allow to warn the user if he misspelled one setting (no match).
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?13873>
_______________________________________________
Message posté via/par Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
