Follow-up Comment #5, patch #3976 (project freeciv):
> Isn't current model (that has the problem of being somewhat overlapping)
about just what you propose.
Yes. It is a generalization of it. Only some extras have an effect. There is
an Irrig_Possible but no Maglev_Possible. What I suggest is moving the build
action (and its requirements) from the extras to actions.
A simplified draft that ignores grouping etc:
[action_road_basic]
result_build_extra = "Road"
reqs =
{ "type", "name", "range", "present"
"UnitFlag", "Settlers", "Local", "TRUE"
"TerrainClass", "Land", "Local", "TRUE"
"Extra", "River", "Local", "FALSE"
}
[action_road_bridge]
result_build_extra = "Road"
reqs =
{ "type", "name", "range", "present"
"UnitFlag", "Settlers", "Local", "TRUE"
"TerrainClass", "Land", "Local", "TRUE"
"Tech", "Bridge building", "Player", TRUE
}
[action_irrig_from_river]
result_build_extra = "Irrigation"
reqs =
{ "type", "name", "range"
"UnitFlag", "Settlers", "Local"
"Extra", "River", "CAdjacent"
}
[action_irrig_from_irrig]
result_build_extra = "Irrigation"
reqs =
{ "type", "name", "range"
"UnitFlag", "Settlers", "Local"
"Extra", "Irrigation", "CAdjacent"
}
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/patch/?3976>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
