On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:06:39 +0100 "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <enrico.weig...@gr13.net> wrote: > > No. Please, enough of these. The code below is commented out > > temporarily to make it easier to test multiplayer while I extract more DOM > > from the login code. > > Why not just keeping such things in a separate patch queue, that can be > applied when needed?
Please stop, and take a look at what you are doing. You just submitted a patch to remove a comment. This is almost the definition of pointless, and in this case outright unhelpful, and you think that I should carry *comment* patches in my queue? I am left now to seriously question your judgement. Not that you seem to be listening. I believe I have made some remarks about priorities and "Fix stuff that is broken". Repeatedly. But perhaps I am right above, and your judgement is so poor that you can not tell what is actually important. I will be delighted to be proven wrong, and in due course I will give all your patches careful attention as is my responsibility. I am actually moderately hopeful that the feature container one will show a *measurable* improvement when it shows up in testing. However I do not intend to repeat myself further on the subject of your misplaced enthusiasm for micro-optimization. You may interpret any future silence from me as such. Cheers, Mike Pope
pgpbkXcWfW3U5.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Freecol-developers mailing list Freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers
