I'd been told the Camera now had some new agendas,
and was totally biased on some issues.   While I've always
been annoyed to find very little focus on East County,
in spite of the banner saying it was Boulder County's
paper, that apparently was only the tip of the iceberg.

I have known Paul Tiger for years, and have seen
few people more concerned about issues of justice,
property rights, and transparent and responsible
local government.  The article that Clint Talbott
wrote is patently out of line.  Voters who want to
know where a County Commissioner candidate
stands on the issues got nothing out of it.   Except of
course a clear understanding that the Camera has
certain candidates it is choosing to target, with the
weapon of words.  This kind of irresponsible
reporting is going to get you a lawsuit someday.

Paul supports the right to carry arms and does
so responsibly and has never shot anyone.  He
knows what the laws are and abides by theml.
Talbott (and by extension the Daily Camera)
has the right to say whatever he wants but he
chooses to use words to launch a personal
attack at the first opportunity, with no content
other than that designed to try to damage the
candidate's credibility.  Who's more responsible?

For those who really want to know what Paul Tiger
stands for go to www.paultiger.com

                        -Eva
--
Eva Kosinski
A Slice of Time
1301 Jackson Ct
Louisville, CO 80027-1634
303-666-5872 (home), 303-817-9653 (cell)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






Reply via email to