Thanks for that bit of light on the issue - and please disregard my rant in further discussions of "Solid".
D. On 08.07.2018 17:43, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Daddy (2018-07-08 16:40:57) >> Bit of an ad-hominem off-topic rant, sorry: >> >> Whenever I see his name, I don't see man who "invented the web" but an >> advocate for DRM >> <https://www.defectivebydesign.org/blog/tim_bernerslee_approves_web_drm_w3c_member_organizations_have_two_weeks_appeal> >> first. >> I don't believe he would produce anything Debian-worthy - but I'll be >> very happy to be proven wrong. > Well, EME - the DRM sandboxing framework which TimBL endorse, _is_ > Debian worthy: See e.g. https://bugs.debian.org/837091 > > EME is not endorsed by FSF, however: See e.g. > https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html > which includes this passage: > >> For instance, a free system distribution must not contain browsers >> that implement EME, the browser functionality designed to load DRM >> modules. > Speaking of which: It seems to me that recent builds of GNUzilla IceCat > come with EME support too, which I suspect it unintended. If someone > reading this is using GNUzilla IceCat, please test the DRM demos at > <https://demo.castlabs.com/> - if a popup appears suggesting to download > a DRM plugin then EME is supported on that browser too. > > > - Jonas > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freedombox-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
_______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
