El vie., 27 nov. 2020 a las 13:00, Joseph Nuthalapati (<[email protected]>) escribió:
> A WebRTC server by itself is not relevant to a FreedomBox user. > ... > When we want to consider adding a new app into FreedomBox, we should > think about the app's use cases from the perspective of an end user. > ... > Discussing about Janus in the context of FreedomBox feels like > discussing about Nginx or Apache. It's only an infrastructure component. > It doesn't qualify as a FreedomBox app. > coturn might seem like an exception to this rule. But it is only listed > as an (advanced) app to allow for manual setups, since it's not fully > integrated yet. > >From what I understand of https://janus.debian.net/demos/ there's a nice bunch of WebRTC-based communication apps available built on top of Janus. Janus' role in FreedomBox would resemble Coturn's.
_______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
