On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I haven't thought through the proposal enough to say i agree or disagree > with it, but i think it would be better served with a term other than > "Admin" for the role with extra public-facing responsibility. > > IIUC, the point is that one group takes on an additional responsibility > -- interacting with other members of the group, committing to publish > allocated names in a timely fashion, being responsive to the members of > the other group, etc. > > I'm curious about what happens to an "admin" who fails to keep up with > their additional responsibilities -- is there a way that other admins > can censure or reject them? can their dependent users tell that the > admin has been censured or rejected? > > --dkg > Sone other titles: wizard -- as in MOOs and MUDs maintainer provider janitor delegate councilmember technician intermediary engineer representative host coordinator assistant aide -- Dick Seabrook Anne Arundel Community College http://vader.aacc.edu/~rhs Speed the Net! _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
