On 06/17/2011 09:27 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 11-06-17 at 09:13pm, Luka Marčetić wrote:
On 06/17/2011 07:24 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 11-06-17 at 05:04pm, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 11-06-17 at 04:40pm, [email protected] wrote:
With the freedombox in mind, I've packaged tahoe-lafs and it's
dependencies in Debian with the help of a proper DD. It has been
accepted in unstable some hours ago, and it should pop up in the
archive soon.
Cool!
Now available unofficially for Debian stable using this APT line:
deb http://debian.jones.dk/ squeeze freedombox
OT: Dirty hacks are dirty. We need desktop Debian (sid, not testing).
Uhm, what do you mean by that?
Tahoe-lafs being dirty? My backporting effort being dirty? FreedomBox
being dirty and desktops not so?!?
Back-porting being dirty, yes. There should be no need. Are you
suggesting Freedombox will be using backports?
_______________________________________________
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
