Hi Charles, Please confirm my understanding of your FreedomNode implementation;
> > i think - providing the decentralized distributed social > networks with > > FBX, along with hosting service, would dramatically > increase the use > > of these possible domain networks. FBX's could be the > routers to some > > kind of "othernets" and should be, i think. If users of > FBX's, fbx'd > > OS's etc. could receive the fast and reliable method to use these > > "freenets" with their hardware and/or software -- interest in that > > "freenet", combined with eventual possibilities of free > video-calling, > > and other highly possible wireless benefits, > > - could eventually become the key reasons for potential users. > > Yep. Right on. That's the business plan. :) > >> it would also > >> be silly to make a device that just feeds your personal data and > >> relationship information back into the same centralized social > >> gatekeepers many of us are currently subject to. > > +1 > > Mmhmm. > > -Charles Wyble (who is about 40 hours away from releasing the > FreedomNode reference implementation). Hope everyone else is > hacking away.... So your FreeNode implementation will be the first pseudo "darknet" (choose whatever label you like: "freenet" "othernet") FBX implementation - well done! So, all FBX's will communicate with each other over a secure and anonymous network independent of the existing DNS. Sweet. I have a couple of questions. Will FBX owners still communicate with people on the existing DNS system (non-FBX owners)? Will an FBX owner have the same contact details across both networks, e.g. [email protected]? Kind Regards -- fiftyfour _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
