-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 On 02/26/2012 10:45 PM, Nick M. Daly wrote:
>> Alas, the code I want to test is done in C (Mandos client), and >> as a developer I had my share of issues from the differences in >> what GCC flags different architectures support. > > QEMU sounds like the better option in your case. Look into > QEmulator/VirtualBricks for a nice frontend. [...] >> This is one of my concerns I wanted to remove by testing. I do >> not know if UBoot boots an initramfs like Debian does on a normal >> PC. A quick look seems to confirm that it does indeed boot an initramfs. So that should make everything much easier. [...] > Qemu emulates the processor, not the DreamPlug-specific hardware > (AFAIK, maybe there's a way to do that). [...] Do you (or anyone) know a way for qemu-system-arm to boot a FreedomMaker image? We tried a few different ways, but nothing seemed to happen. > But yes, if you could post source somewhere, I'd give it a shot > (there are also other folks on this list who have plugs), if you > give me 3 days to a week of turn-around time. I won't test > binary-blobs though. Our package "Mandos" is actually in Debian. The hard part is to generate a FreedomBox installation with an encrypted root filesystem to test it on. /Björn Påhlsson -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEAREDAAYFAk9TxWUACgkQC+Cq+bUsy1IjBgCghNJ1Z7W5IWsaTUYFPyKSLP6/ fasAoJYOm29FjeDYJnS8DYsg42dHBAnh =5+LJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
