Robert has been the master of the logo. If you two are happy, I'm happy, as I defer to your expertise.
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:05:59 -0400, Sean O'Brien <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the quick feedback. You're right about the shadows looking > like scrollbars, esp. on a small screen. I can fix that in a few ways, > and still keep the shadow look, definitely make sure those pixels don't > show on small screens. > > The rest just takes some CSS tweaks, and the logotype is a discussion > for whomever is making those decisions. I have mixed feelings about > it...although it distinguishes the logo from the butterfly logo for the > box itself, it also is a little busy (lotta letters to squeeze in > there). So maybe it's something to fix with typography tweaks, maybe > "foundation" has to go. > > ~ Sean > > > On 03/30/2012 01:13 PM, James Vasile wrote: > > Nice. That is already a huge improvement over what we currently have. > > > > The thin vertical columns on left and right look on my screen like > > scroll bars. That strikes me as a bug. > > > > Should "Foundation" be in the logotype along with FreedomBox? > > > > The line spacing in "Enabling Private\nConversations Online" is a bit > > wide. > > > > Aside from those minor comments, that is excellent. > > > > Thanks, > > James >
pgpgwodn7UuXp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
