>________________________________ > From: James Gilmore <james.d.gilm...@gmail.com> >To: freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org >Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2012 10:51 AM >Subject: Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Would you sign a key with a pseudonymous >keyholder name? > >
> [...] > >The whole point of key-signing is that you're verifying that you do know the >providence of the data signed or encrypted by that key. Anonymity is the >opposite of that. If you want anonymity, then you don't want public key >encryption. They are not compatible. Did you mean to say, "if you want anonymity, then you don't want key signing"? -Jonathan _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
