Another independent call for a FreedomBox, more or less.

I have sent the author an email with lots of links and thoughts... funnily enough he was my doctoral supervisor.

Russell


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [PRIVACY] [apfma] Can the mother of all supercomputers save us from Big Brother?
Date:   Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:07:28 +1100

        
Reply-To:       [email protected]
To:     [email protected]



http://theconversation.edu.au/can-the-mother-of-all-supercomputers-save-us-from-big-brother-10584

   Matthew Bailes
   12 November 2012, 8.11am AEST

   Today I’m annoyed at Facebook. Among the amazingly witty and
   touching postings from my friends and Amnesty International are
   “pages you might like
   
<http://www.insidefacebook.com/2012/08/02/facebook-adds-sponsored-stories-to-pages-you-may-like-mobile-module/>”
   and advertisements for things I don’t need, especially single women.

   But on a happier note, I’m thinking about the mother of all
   supercomputers (and if there’s one thing I’ll always be grateful to
   Saddam Hussein for, it was for introducinginto the Western lexicon
   <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother_of_all>the expression, “the
   mother of all …”).

   As I speak, the internet is enabling me to be simultaneously sitting
   in on an international advisory board meeting from the privacy of my
   own bedroom using a webcam, running jobs to look for neutron stars
   on 57,344 processing cores on my new toy, Swinburne’s “Gstar
   Supercomputer <http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/supercomputing/green2/>”
   (or what I like to call “the beast”) and of course, thinking about
   this article.

   I learnt long ago that when you rock up at a university and tell
   people you are an astronomer it sounds a bit esoteric and
   irrelevant, but when you say you’re a supercomputer expert it gains
   traction, funding and subsequent glory!

   Why? Well fortunately, most senior bureaucrats in universities like
   to invest in enabling infrastructure, and supercomputers sound like
   serious, hard-core investments that will lead to engineering and
   scientific glory.

   Supercomputers can also be turned off at no cost, and because of the
   wonders ofaccrual accounting
   <http://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/accrualaccounting.asp>their
   impact on the budget is minor.


       Enter the beast

   At Swinburne we have an astonishingly-powerful supercomputer. It has
   more than 100,000 cores, a 2,000-terabyte “disk” and 10,000GB of RAM
   all linked by 40 gigabit-per-second networking.

   It is the sort of machine that brings a tear to an astrophysicist’s
   eye. We can literally simulate the universe in it, make movies, and
   find neutron stars in astonishingly peculiar environments.

   The beast’s architecture and “building blocks” are not unlike the
   machines used by Google and Facebook in large data centres. It
   comprises about 150 “enterprise-grade”GPU servers
   <http://www.sgi.com/products/gpu/>on an uninterruptable power supply
   in a custom machine room.

   Over the next few years it will grind through Petabytes (1PB =
   1024TB) of data and serve the Swinburne and wider Australian
   astrophysical communities, courtesy ofAstronomy Australia Limited
   <http://astronomyaustralia.org.au/>.

   But the beast is but a mouse compared to the cumulative domestic
   computational power plugged into the internet and owned by Mr and Ms
   Average in their own homes.

   And there are some computational problems, such as searching for
   aliens, that are “embarrassingly parallel
   <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embarrassingly_parallel>” – that is,
   a problem divisible into so many independent parts that can all be
   run in parallel that I’m embarrassed to say how many – a fact
   recognised bythe geniuses
   <http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/sah_about.php>behindSETI@home
   <http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/>andBOINC <http://boinc.berkeley.edu/>.

   The SETI@home project has used more than 3 million home computers to
   look for aliens, and is the largest distributed computing project
   ever devised. A computational marvel. A triumph of software engineering.

   And the current alien body count? Nil. Even inRoswell
   <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roswell_UFO_incident>. But even
   SETI@home is only using a tiny fraction of the “mother of all
   supercomputers”, the global internet and every home PC on the planet.


       Facebook is watching

   So what other problems apart fromclimate research, cosmology,
   gravity and alien-hunting <http://www.gridrepublic.org/>map to this
   massively distributed paradigm? Well, maybe Facebook?

   Facebook houses a repository of everyone’s friends, postings, photos
   etc. When you log in, Facebook builds a web page that lists your
   friends' posts, their photos, and responses to your friends' posts.
   It is an embarrassingly parallel problem with a bit of data exchange.

   It also works out from all your data what advertising you are most
   likely to respond to and hits you with ads. It knows who your
   friends are, and what you like. It spies on you to know what to try
   and sell you.

   It tracks you around the world. It is the modern version of Big Brother.

   I don’t like that. Some people thought Facebook was worth almost
   US$100 billion. I don’t think it is andneither
   
<http://news.yahoo.com/facebook-stock-slides-lock-expires-141803895--finance.html>,
   apparently, does “the market”.

   The algorithm required to build a web page is trivial compared to
   alien-hunting. The storage capacity per user is tiny compared to a
   typical user’s home storage, and as the need to push for extra
   advertising revenue increases it is inevitable that people will
   become alienated and want out.

   Finally, unlike a bank, Facebook is about trivia, and if it “goes
   down" the world doesn’t end. So it is a very safe application to
   work on. Indeed if everyone who used Facebook left their computers
   on 100% of the time, software to emulate Facebook’s core activities
   would be fairly simple to implement.

   For each friend, a local application could bug all your friends'
   computers for recent “activity”, and build up the relevant web page
   for display without any market bias or promotional activities. Bliss!

   The problem is that most of us turn our computers off. So that
   complicates any would-be programming model. An alternative is
   therefore for users to lease space for their private data on “the
   cloud”, and allow friends with an appropriate key to see what you
   have been up to.

   Another option might be to have a micro PC like the amazing 5
   WattRaspberry Pi <http://www.raspberrypi.org/faqs>permanently online
   in your house that contains all of your social media data.

   The Raspberry Pi costs A$35, and only costs about 2c/day to run.

   As users become increasingly uncomfortable with Big Brother knowing
   things about them that they’d prefer were kept secret, programmers
   will find ways to harness the mother of all supercomputers – the
   massively distributed global internet and all the home computers
   that reside on it.

   The community-run networkDiaspora* <https://joindiaspora.com/>is one
   attempt to do this for Facebook but other applications will follow.

   When someone gets one right they might not discover aliens, but the
   effect on our lives might be almost as profound.



_______________________________________________
apf-media-archive mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.privacy.org.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/apf-media-archive

_______________________________________________
This is the EFA Privacy mailing list.

To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with "unsubscribe 
privacy" in the message body, or visit this webpage: 
http://lists.efa.org.au/wws/info/privacy
_______________________________________________
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss

Reply via email to