[Tim Retout] > I agree - I've only been looking at this for a few days, but the > duplication does look risky.
Lets get rid of it. :) > Looking at the options, I wonder if debian-live can be used to build > the images? The "hdd" target should get us something quite like the > VM image, and apparently live-build can cross-build for armel these > days. I am sure it could be used, and it would be trivial if we go with my proposal to use a freedombox-setup deb. > This probably does imply moving the setup into Debian packages. I > won't comment on the details of how that is done, because I haven't > looked at that bit yet! I would love to hear comments and opinions on my proposal. > Personally I am finding the source/sourcecode directory confusing - it > doesn't contain source code, it's got a binary package committed in > it! Yeah. In my rewrite, it is no longer used to populate the chroot. > Is Plinth installing modules from there? I have not been able to find any traces of plinth being activated, nor any idea how it is to be set up, so I have no idea. > Surely (in the long term) the modules should be uploaded to a mirror > as e.g. freedombox-module-ical, and should be installed via apt? Yes. Either we just start uploading to Debian, or we make some other repository for this purpose. -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss