I remember this site, or one like it. I seem to be unique as well, which is a bad thing.
-- *Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 3,317,711 tested so far.* *Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that conveys at least 21.66 bits of identifying information.* *The measurements we used to obtain this result are listed below. You can read more about our methodology, statistical results, and some defenses against fingerprinting in this article<https://panopticlick.eff.org/browser-uniqueness.pdf> .* -- On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen <p...@hungry.com>wrote: > Hi. I just tested the privoxy setup in freedombox using the browser > fingerprint service availalbe from > <URL: https://panopticlick.eff.org/ >, and it said my "browser > fingerprint appears to be unique among the 3,317,576 tested so far". > > I was using Opera as a web browser, which was said to provide at least > 12 bits of identifying value, while the most significant part was > HTTP_ACCEPT Headers (I got Javascript mostliy turned off). > > This experiment made me wonder exactly what privoxy is providing in > freedombox, and how efficient it is. Can we adjust something to make > it more efficient? Perhaps sort HTTP accept headers? > > -- > Happy hacking > Petter Reinholdtsen > > _______________________________________________ > Freedombox-discuss mailing list > Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss > -- *"Anything created must necessarily be inferior to the essence of the creator." -- Claude Shouse (sho...@macomw.arpa) "Einstein's mother must have been one heck of a physicist." -- Joseph C. Wang (j...@athena.mit.edu) *
_______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
