Quoting ST (2014-04-09 17:34:00) > if no CMS was integrated yet - I suggest to use Fossil ( > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossil_(software) ) instead of Ikiwiki. I > took a look on Ikiwiki and realized that Fossil covers almost all > Ikiwiki features but offers much more. It is small (only one file), > fast (written in C) and is tuned for security.
Ikiwiki is a wiki _compiler_ (i.e. result is served as static pages), using git as backend. Seems to me that Fossil is mainly an alternative to git, with a builtin wiki engine (i.e. probably _not_ served as static pages so arguably less secure and possibly less efficient). - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
_______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
