Quoting Sunil Mohan Adapa (2014-11-08 17:11:17) > On Saturday 08 November 2014 03:48 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > [...] >> I recommend to try use uwsgi - that allows separation of application >> configuration from frontend web serving configuration (i.e. tuning of >> Apache or Nginx or for development using uwsgi's own web serving). > > Plinth is now a WSGI application which can potentially be served by > any WSGI compliant web server. It is continuing to use CherryPy for > web serving. > > During development, we are directly using CherryPy's web server > without Apache/Nginx. In end-user setup, Apache is reverse-proxying > requests. > > I suppose CherryPy is serving the same purpose as uwsgi.
I suspect it is not quite same: With uWSGI you use exact same configuration, and the applet is executed under exact same environment (username, access rights etc.), where Apache and NGinx (and yet CherryPi too, I guess) each require different setup to establish a WSGI environment. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
_______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
