Am Donnerstag, den 12.05.2016, 18:28 -0400 schrieb James Valleroy: > On 05/12/2016 03:07 PM, Dietmar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I did yesterday an 'apt upgrade' (my impression is that > > unattended-upgrades are not working, but no proof yet, no error > > messages in the log). > > The result was that I had a new network interface 'eth0' again, which > > was activated, additionally to the 'FreedomBox WAN'. > > I had to remove (via Plinth) eth0 to have access from the outside to > > the box again. > > It's the 2nd or 3rd time I am observing this. So my impression is that > > some configuration is getting overwritten during the upgrade process. > > Has anyone else observed this? > > > > Just out of curiosity, were there any dpkg prompts during the apt upgrade?
No, now dpkg prompts, but 2 packages are kept back because the new versions in sid conflict with my owncloud. > > > Also, I observed that my domain name was not listed any more in the > > name-services. I had to enter it again to find it activated. The same > > root cause? > > > > This sounds related to https://github.com/freedombox/Plinth/issues/262. > When Plinth is restarted, the config module will add the current > domainname to the Name Services page. But if the domain name is blank in > Configuration (due to issue 262), then it won't be added. > > A quick workaround for this issue is to change the hostname to anything > other than the default value ("freedombox"). Then set the domain name > again on the Configuration page. Thanks Dietmar > > -- > James > > _______________________________________________ > Freedombox-discuss mailing list > Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
_______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss